Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Tales From The Other Side - Alternative Culture to enlighten a mediocre mood

 
Alternative Culture and ideas, ready to be injected into your Reality.
Nihongo ga dekimasuka? I can! I speak Japanese and English. Kevin Rudd can speak Mandarin. Kerry Armstrong can speak Italian.

No matter who you are, learning a second language is more than worthwhile. But why?

Let’s take the obvious one first. Speaking another language helps you communicate with people from other countries. It may take a while to develop a level that lends itself to practical use, but it is rewarding when you can develop that level.

This communicative ability extends beyond direct conversation. It also helps us to understand what other cultures say about us, or any other issues.


How do you know when there is something wrong under the hood of your car? The Mechanic tells you, because he can understand what the inside of your car means. How do you really KNOW though that he’s honest, not just hitting you up for more that it’s worth? You don’t.

The second language equivalent of this broken car is a broken conversation. OR worse yet, a broken communication. If we rely on other people to convey the information we leave ourselves open to being mislead.

Gaijin Crime File
Gaijin Crime File


THIS IMAGE above is of a magazine sold in Japan, the title 外人犯罪ファイル is translated as Foreigner Crime file. One might think from looking at this, and it’s terminology (using terms such as ‘nigger’) that it reflects a general dislike of foreigners in Japan. However, if you can translate such things as Reviews on Amazon.com, you would be able to see what the Japanese really think of the publication. For this particular magazine there are two Japanese reviews, discussing concerns about the way in which Japanese may be thought of for the publication and expressing displeasure with the hypocrisy of the publication.


There are always controversies somewhere tied in with language, and the better your linguistic ability, the better you can understand all points of view to a debate. There was a great deal of fuss about the terminology used in a Japanese textbook to describe the Nanking Massacre (Have a look here for more on Japanese textbook controversies). Protests in China linked to the term ‘Incident’ being used instead of ‘Massacre’. We as a Western society consider these terms in their translated context – how we would feel if K-Rudd referred to Iraq ‘Incident’ instead of ‘War’. However, while the choice of terminology is definitely in this case political, a speaker of Japanese knows that incident (事変 carries dark connotations that would permit it as appropriate terminology.

Second example. Sheik Al-Hiali, who famously made the statement ‘If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem,” when referring to a victim of rape.

I remember early on following these comments, a story on the news, stating that they had their own ‘special translation’. In a world where one word could be translated as incident or massacre, imagine what a ‘special translation’ could possibly do. Not only could a second language specifically help you to understand the meaning of an original statement, the basic knowledge of a second language gives one a rudimentary grasp of the very nature of the flawed and malleable science of translation.

In conclusion it would be difficult to underestimate the value of learning a second language and I recommend it – for both the value of a second language and the value of the greater understanding and appreciation of the very nature of language.

Image W00kie licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
59
Vote
   


Kids Want To Learn

January 21st 2008 13:23
When you play your Nintendo DS and you’re working on an awesome game, and you get past level one, the game rewards you with a second level that is harder than the first. Your reward for completing a challenge is a harder challenge.

Think about small children. You see them poking, prodding, moving things around, experimenting. This is playing. It is also learning. To a point, the two things are, and should be, essentially linked.

A lot of children are initially exited to begin school. By the time you get up a few years though, this has changed. Kids are no longer enjoying learning in a school context, and even basic things like libraries and educational websites are beginning to be regarded as bad things.

Mark Twain is often quoted as saying ‘Never let your Education interfere with your learning.’ It’s great that we can keep this sentiment in mind, but it’d be even nicer to put it into practice. Essentially because this is the great paradox of learning.

We send students to school to learn. They want to learn. However, the institutionalisation of learning – schooling – is not always wanted. Often it is resented.



Why is this? To understand this we first have to accept that learning and schooling are ultimately separate concepts.

LEARNING – Extending personal ability.
- Gaining information and ability.
- Adoption of knowledge in theoretical and practical contexts.
- Developing an understanding of everyday things and concepts.

SCHOOLING – Systematic processes of social control
- Development of skill directed towards enabling students to gain employment through set processes.
- Process of social control.
- Disciplinarian structure with an emphasis on interpersonal competition.

Mindmap
Is this kind of thing acceptable in learning? In schooing? Organisation? Chaos? How should it all be done?

The first and arguably most important thing we can take from this is that learning and schooling are two separate concepts. To further extend this idea, we may also suggest that a student good at school is not by that token definitely a good learner, or that a student who is a good learner will definitely be a good student.

When we think back to the baby in the dirt, playing, LEARNING, it becomes a worry that through 12 years of schooling we manage to destroy so many students love of learning.

I do not think our school or education system is essentially broken or any such. What I do believe is that there are different ways to do things – and our duty as parents, teachers, facilitators of lifelong learning and life long learners ourselves, is to pursue these different methods of teaching and caring to ensure we never, ever, let the joy of learning whither up and die.

Image by Jurvetson, Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
65
Vote
   


MATURE CONTENT
   


Schools for Learning not Competition

December 6th 2007 14:31
We hear this idea a lot- we need to know if our kids are winning. Winning what? Just winning. Right.

Winning at life, presumably. However, if we need a system where there are winners, then inherently we need losers.

So we produce a system whereby we have to judge our students harshly. And as we do, we send a clear message to our failing students – give up. You have failed. You are a failure. There are two types of people, winners and losers, and you are a loser.

You may think I exaggerate here. I wish I were. However, this is a prevailing attitude in many areas. In ‘Dumbing Down’ Geoffrey Blainey attacks proponents of ‘Outcomes Based Education’ for being suspicious of “Competitive examination,” and for perceiving failing students to be “unfair to the failures.”

you suck
Is this the message we want to give to kids early on?


While Blainy does explore some reasonable arguments in this introduction, I take issue with his dismissive tone here. Firstly, it sounds all very professional to promote ‘competitive exams’. However, who are the students competing against? Each other? Why? Is there some kind of shortage in Australia of passing marks? The drought means we can’t grow enough A ’s for everyone? If students are competing, it should be against themselves – to try and improve themselves. Otherwise, the suggestion seems to be to make tests just hard enough to make sure we have some students who can be treated as winners, and some treated as losers.

Blainey also demonstrates another all too common attitude. The quote I have used states that he feels it to be problematic the idea that failing students is ‘unfair to the failures’.

I find this problematic, the ease at which one may simply, publicly find fault with a system that does not work on the basis of winners and losers, and criticize systems that seek to give failing students a fighting chance.

Ultimately, it sounds good and noble to complain that schools are wimpy, afraid of competition and mollycoddle failures. However, making students compete against each other is not giving each student the best chance at life. Dividing students into failures and successes while in lower grades, rather then maximizing a students potential for real success does not help anyone.

We win or lose by how we choose. Let's support the idea that each child can be supported enough to make those winning choices.

IMAGE.
80
Vote
   


My Pedagogic Creed

August 20th 2007 02:29
John Dewey's famous declaration concerning education. First published in The School Journal, Volume LIV, Number 3 (January 16, 1897), pages 77-80.

ARTICLE I--What Education Is

John DeweyI believe that all education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race. This process begins unconsciously almost at birth, and is continually shaping the individual's powers, saturating his consciousness, forming his habits, training his ideas, and arousing his feelings and emotions. Through this unconscious education the individual gradually comes to share in the intellectual and moral resources which humanity has succeeded in getting together. He becomes an inheritor of the funded capital of civilization. The most formal and technical education in the world cannot safely depart from this general process. It can only organize it or differentiate it in some particular direction.

I believe that the only true education comes through the stimulation of the child's powers by the demands of the social situations in which he finds himself. Through these demands he is stimulated to act as a member of a unity, to emerge from his original narrowness of action and feeling, and to conceive of himself from the standpoint of the welfare of the group to which he belongs. Through the responses which others make to his own activities he comes to know what these mean in social terms. The value which they have is reflected back into them. For instance, through the response which is made to the child's instinctive babblings the child comes to know what those babblings mean; they are transformed into articulate language and thus the child is introduced into the consolidated wealth of ideas and emotions which are now summed up in language.

I believe that this educational process has two sides-one psychological and one sociological; and that neither can be subordinated to the other or neglected without evil results following. Of these two sides, the psychological is the basis. The child's own instincts and powers furnish the material and give the starting point for all education. Save as the efforts of the educator connect with some activity which the child is carrying on of his own initiative independent of the educator, education becomes reduced to a pressure from without. It may, indeed, give certain external results, but cannot truly be called educative. Without insight into the psychological structure and activities of the individual, the educative process will, therefore, be haphazard and arbitrary. If it chances to coincide with the child's activity it will get a leverage; if it does not, it will result in friction, or disintegration, or arrest of the child nature.

I believe that knowledge of social conditions, of the present state of civilization, is necessary in order properly to interpret the child's powers. The child has his own instincts and tendencies, but we do not know what these mean until we can translate them into their social equivalents. We must be able to carry them back into a social past and see them as the inheritance of previous race activities. We must also be able to project them into the future to see what their outcome and end will be. In the illustration just used, it is the ability to see in the child's babblings the promise and potency of a future social intercourse and conversation which enables one to deal in the proper way with that instinct.

I believe that the psychological and social sides are organically related and that education cannot be regarded as a compromise between the two, or a superimposition of one upon the other. We are told that the psychological definition of education is barren and formal--that it gives us only the idea of a development of all the mental powers without giving us any idea of the use to which these powers are put. On the other hand, it is urged that the social definition of education, as getting adjusted to civilization, makes of it a forced and external process, and results in subordinating the freedom of the individual to a preconceived social and political status.

I believe that each of these objections is true when urged against one side isolated from the other. In order to know what a power really is we must know what its end, use, or function is; and this we cannot know save as we conceive of the individual as active in social relationships. But, on the other hand, the only possible adjustment which we can give to the child under existing conditions, is that which arises through putting him in complete possession of all his powers. With the advent of democracy and modern industrial conditions, it is impossible to foretell definitely just what civilization will be twenty years from now. Hence it is impossible to prepare the child for any precise set of conditions. To prepare him for the future life means to give him command of himself; it means so to train him that he will have the full and ready use of all his capacities; that his eye and ear and hand may be tools ready to command, that his judgment may be capable of grasping the conditions under which it has to work, and the executive forces be trained to act economically and efficiently. It is impossible to reach this sort of adjustment save as constant regard is had to the individual's own powers, tastes, and interests-say, that is, as education is continually converted into psychological terms.

In sum, I believe that the individual who is to be educated is a social individual and that society is an organic union of individuals. If we eliminate the social factor from the child we are left only with an abstraction; if we eliminate the individual factor from society, we are left only with an inert and lifeless mass. Education, therefore, must begin with a psychological insight into the child's capacities, interests, and habits. It must be controlled at every point by reference to these same considerations. These powers, interests, and habits must be continually interpreted--we must know what they mean. They must be translated into terms of their social equivalents--into terms of what they are capable of in the way of social service.

ARTICLE II--What the School Is

I believe that the school is primarily a social institution. Education being a social process, the school is simply that form of community life in which all those agencies are concentrated that will be most effective in bringing the child to share in the inherited resources of the race, and to use his own powers for social ends.

I believe that education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living.

I believe that the school must represent present life-life as real and vital to the child as that which he carries on in the home, in the neighborhood, or on the playground.

I believe that education which does not occur through forms of life, or that are worth living for their own sake, is always a poor substitute for the genuine reality and tends to cramp and to deaden.

I believe that the school, as an institution, should simplify existing social life; should reduce it, as it were, to an embryonic form. Existing life is so complex that the child cannot be brought into contact with it without either confusion or distraction; he is either overwhelmed by the multiplicity of activities which are going on, so that he loses his own power of orderly reaction, or he is so stimulated by these various activities that his powers are prematurely called into play and he becomes either unduly specialized or else disintegrated.

I believe that as such simplified social life, the school life should grow gradually out of the home life; that it should take up and continue the activities with which the child is already familiar in the home.

I believe that it should exhibit these activities to the child, and reproduce them in such ways that the child will gradually learn the meaning of them, and be capable of playing his own part in relation to them.

I believe that this is a psychological necessity, because it is the only way of securing continuity in the child's growth, the only way of giving a back-ground of past experience to the new ideas given in school.

I believe that it is also a social necessity because the home is the form of social life in which the child has been nurtured and in connection with which he has had his moral training. It is the business of the school to deepen and extend his sense of the values bound up in his home life.

I believe that much of present education fails because it neglects this fundamental principle of the school as a form of community life. It conceives the school as a place where certain information is to be given, where certain lessons are to be ]earned, or where certain habits are to be formed. The value of these is conceived as lying largely in the remote future; the child must do these things for the sake of something else he is to do; they are mere preparation. As a result they do not become a part of the life experience of the child and so are not truly educative.

I believe that the moral education centers upon this conception of the school as a mode of social life, that the best and deepest moral training is precisely that which one gets through having to enter into proper relations with others in a unity of work and thought. The present educational systems, so far as they destroy or neglect this unity, render it difficult or impossible to get any genuine, regular moral training.

I believe that the child should be stimulated and controlled in his work through the life of the community.

I believe that under existing conditions far too much of the stimulus and control proceeds from the teacher, because of neglect of the idea of the school as a form of social life.

I believe that the teacher's place and work in the school is to be interpreted from this same basis. The teacher is not in the school to impose certain ideas or to form certain habits in the child, but is there as a member of the community to select the influences which shall affect the child and to assist him in properly responding to these influences.

I believe that the discipline of the school should proceed from the life of the school as a whole and not directly from the teacher.

I believe that the teacher's business is simply to determine on the basis of larger experience and riper wisdom, how the discipline of life shall come to the child.

I believe that all questions of the grading of the child and his promotion should be determined by reference to the same standard. Examinations are of use only so far as they test the child's fitness for social life and reveal the place in which he can be of the most service and where he can receive the most help.


ARTICLE III--The Subject-Matter of Education

I believe that the social life of the child is the basis of concentration, or correlation, in all his training or growth. The social life gives the unconscious unity and the background of all his efforts and of all his attainments.

I believe that the subject-matter of the school curriculum should mark a gradual differentiation out of the primitive unconscious unity of social life.

I believe that we violate the child's nature and render difficult the best ethical results, by introducing the child too abruptly to a number of special studies, of reading, writing, geography, etc., out of relation to this social life.

I believe, therefore, that the true center of correlation on the school subjects is not science, nor literature, nor history, nor geography, but the child's own social activities.

I believe that education cannot be unified in the study of science, or so called nature study, because apart from human activity, nature itself is not a unity; nature in itself is a number of diverse objects in space and time, and to attempt to make it the center of work by itself, is to introduce a principle of radiation rather than one of concentration.

I believe that literature is the reflex expression and interpretation of social experience; that hence it must follow upon and not precede such experience. It, therefore, cannot be made the basis, although it may be made the summary of unification.

I believe once more that history is of educative value in so far as it presents phases of social life and growth. It must be controlled by reference to social life. When taken simply as history it is thrown into the distant past and becomes dead and inert. Taken as the record of man's social life and progress it becomes full of meaning. I believe, however, that it cannot be so taken excepting as the child is also introduced directly into social life.

I believe accordingly that the primary basis of education is in the child's powers at work along the same general constructive lines as those which have brought civilization into being.

I believe that the only way to make the child conscious of his social heritage is to enable him to perform those fundamental types of activity which make civilization what it is.

I believe, therefore, in the so-called expressive or constructive activities as the center of correlation.

I believe that this gives the standard for the place of cooking, sewing, manual training, etc., in the school.

I believe that they are not special studies which are to be introduced over and above a lot of others in the way of relaxation or relief, or as additional accomplishments. I believe rather that they represent, as types, fundamental forms of social activity; and that it is possible and desirable that the child's introduction into the more formal subjects of the curriculum be through the medium of these activities.

I believe that the study of science is educational in so far as it brings out the materials and processes which make social life what it is.

I believe that one of the greatest difficulties in the present teaching of science is that the material is presented in purely objective form, or is treated as a new peculiar kind of experience which the child can add to that which he has already had. In reality, science is of value because it gives the ability to interpret and control the experience already had. It should be introduced, not as so much new subject-matter, but as showing the factors already involved in previous experience and as furnishing tools by which that experience can be more easily and effectively regulated.

I believe that at present we lose much of the value of literature and language studies because of our elimination of the social element. Language is almost always treated in the books of pedagogy simply as the expression of thought. It is true that language is a logical instrument, but it is fundamentally and primarily a social instrument. Language is the device for communication; it is the tool through which one individual comes to share the ideas and feelings of others. When treated simply as a way of getting individual information, or as a means of showing off what one has learned, it loses its social motive and end.

I believe that there is, therefore, no succession of studies in the ideal school curriculum. If education is life, all life has, from the outset, a scientific aspect, an aspect of art and culture, and an aspect of communication. It cannot, therefore, be true that the proper studies for one grade are mere reading and writing, and that at a later grade, reading, or literature, or science, may be introduced. The progress is not in the succession of studies but in the development of new attitudes towards, and new interests in, experience.

I believe finally, that education must be conceived as a continuing reconstruction of experience; that the process and the goal of education are one and the same thing.

I believe that to set up any end outside of education, as furnishing its goal and standard, is to deprive the educational process of much of its meaning and tends to make us rely upon false and external stimuli in dealing with the child.


ARTICLE IV--The Nature of Method
I believe that the question of method is ultimately reducible to the question of the order of development of the child's powers and interests. The law for presenting and treating material is the law implicit within the child's own nature. Because this is so I believe the following statements are of supreme importance as determining the spirit in which education is carried on:

1. I believe that the active side precedes the passive in the development of the child nature; that expression comes before conscious impression; that the muscular development precedes the sensory; that movements come before conscious sensations; I believe that consciousness is essentially motor or impulsive; that conscious states tend to project themselves in action.

I believe that the neglect of this principle is the cause of a large part of the waste of time and strength in school work. The child is thrown into a passive, receptive, or absorbing attitude. The conditions are such that he is not permitted to follow the law of his nature; the result is friction and waste.

I believe that ideas (intellectual and rational processes) also result from action and devolve for the sake of the better control of action. What we term reason is primarily the law of orderly or effective action. To attempt to develop the reasoning powers, the powers of judgment, without reference to the selection and arrangement of means in action, is the fundamental fallacy in our present methods of dealing with this matter. As a result we present the child with arbitrary symbols. Symbols are a necessity in mental development, but they have their place as tools for economizing effort; presented by themselves they are a mass of meaningless and arbitrary ideas imposed from without.

2. I believe that the image is the great instrument of instruction. What a child gets out of any subject presented to him is simply the images which he himself forms with regard to it.

I believe that if nine tenths of the energy at present directed towards making the child learn certain things, were spent in seeing to it that the child was forming proper images, the work of instruction would be indefinitely facilitated.

I believe that much of the time and attention now given to the preparation and presentation of lessons might be more wisely and profitably expended in training the child's power of imagery and in seeing to it that he was continually forming definite, vivid, and growing images of the various subjects with which he comes in contact in his experience.

3. I believe that interests are the signs and symptoms of growing power. I believe that they represent dawning capacities. Accordingly the constant and careful observation of interests is of the utmost importance for the educator.

I believe that these interests are to be observed as showing the state of development which the child has reached.

I believe that they prophesy the stage upon which he is about to enter.

I believe that only through the continual and sympathetic observation of childhood's interests can the adult enter into the child's life and see what it is ready for, and upon what material it could work most readily and fruitfully.

I believe that these interests are neither to be humored nor repressed. To repress interest is to substitute the adult for the child, and so to weaken intellectual curiosity and alertness, to suppress initiative, and to deaden interest. To humor the interests is to substitute the transient for the permanent. The interest is always the sign of some power below; the important thing is to discover this power. To humor the interest is to fail to penetrate below the surface and its sure result is to substitute caprice and whim for genuine interest.

4. I believe that the emotions are the reflex of actions.

I believe that to endeavor to stimulate or arouse the emotions apart from their corresponding activities, is to introduce an unhealthy and morbid state of mind.

I believe that if we can only secure right habits of action and thought, with reference to the good, the true, and the beautiful, the emotions will for the most part take care of themselves.

I believe that next to deadness and dullness, formalism and routine, our education is threatened with no greater evil than sentimentalism.

I believe that this sentimentalism is the necessary result of the attempt to divorce feeling from action.

ARTICLE V-The School and Social Progress

I believe that education is the fundamental method of social progress and reform.

I believe that all reforms which rest simply upon the enactment of law, or the threatening of certain penalties, or upon changes in mechanical or outward arrangements, are transitory and futile.

I believe that education is a regulation of the process of coming to share in the social consciousness; and that the adjustment of individual activity on the basis of this social consciousness is the only sure method of social reconstruction.

I believe that this conception has due regard for both the individualistic and socialistic ideals. It is duly individual because it recognizes the formation of a certain character as the only genuine basis of right living. It is socialistic because it recognizes that this right character is not to be formed by merely individual precept, example, or exhortation, but rather by the influence of a certain form of institutional or community life upon the individual, and that the social organism through the school, as its organ, may determine ethical results.

I believe that in the ideal school we have the reconciliation of the individualistic and the institutional ideals.

I believe that the community's duty to education is, therefore, its paramount moral duty. By law and punishment, by social agitation and discussion, society can regulate and form itself in a more or less haphazard and chance way. But through education society can formulate its own purposes, can organize its own means and resources, and thus shape itself with definiteness and economy in the direction in which it wishes to move.

I believe that when society once recognizes the possibilities in this direction, and the obligations which these possibilities impose, it is impossible to conceive of the resources of time, attention, and money which will be put at the disposal of the educator.

I believe that it is the business of every one interested in education to insist upon the school as the primary and most effective interest of social progress and reform in order that society may be awakened to realize what the school stands for, and aroused to the necessity of endowing the educator with sufficient equipment properly to perform his task.

I believe that education thus conceived marks the most perfect and intimate union of science and art conceivable in human experience.

I believe that the art of thus giving shape to human powers and adapting them to social service, is the supreme art; one calling into its service the best of artists; that no insight, sympathy, tact, executive power, is too great for such service.

I believe that with the growth of psychological service, giving added insight into individual structure and laws of growth; and with growth of social science, adding to our knowledge of the right organization of individuals, all scientific resources can be utilized for the purposes of education.

I believe that when science and art thus join hands the most commanding motive for human action will be reached; the most genuine springs of human conduct aroused and the best service that human nature is capable of guaranteed.

I believe, finally, that the teacher is engaged, not simply in the training of individuals, but in the formation of the proper social life.

I believe that every teacher should realize the dignity of his calling; that he is a social servant set apart for the maintenance of proper social order and the securing of the right social growth.

I believe that in this way the teacher always is the prophet of the true God and the usherer in of the true kingdom of God.

How to cite this piece: Dewey, John (1897) 'My pedagogic creed', The School Journal, Volume LIV, Number 3 (January 16, 1897), pages 77-80. Also available in the informal education archives, Really Long Link

This article is available elsewhere under a GNU Free Documentation Licence. As a result it has been reproduced here on the understanding that it is not subject to any copyright restrictions, and that it is, and will remain, in the public domain.
45
Vote
   


Let under 18s Vote.

May 30th 2007 11:01
I was a pretty angry kid during High School. I guess I know why now… a whole lot of things. But one of the things which still makes me angry is the way in which the Government is happy to boot around students.

Unfortunately, students aren’t exactly high up on the agenda for Governments. At least, not so far as their actual welfare is considered. Some problems in schools? Make the students work harder. Or make them read Shakespeare. Or make them… whatever. Point is, students tend to get the arse end of the deal


[ Click here to read more ]
70
Vote
   


Brenton's Blogs

10945 Vote(s)
370 Comment(s)
139 Post(s)
3486 Vote(s)
17 Comment(s)
66 Post(s)
3933 Vote(s)
45 Comment(s)
57 Post(s)
Moderated by Brenton
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]