Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Tales From The Other Side - Alternative Culture to enlighten a mediocre mood

 
Alternative Culture and ideas, ready to be injected into your Reality.

Equality in an Unequal World

January 31st 2008 13:54
Martin Luthor King claimed that all men were created equal. However, we all know that’s false. Some men are taller. Some are shorter. Some are fat. Some are missing bits. I myself am missing a piece of my kidney.

As some smart arse one said – if all men are equal, why are some in jail?

If all men are equal, why can we send a killer to the electric chair when he is smart, but not when he’s retarded?

The fact is that we are all different and thus not equal. I would never be first choice on a basketball team, would never be welcome in the female loo and would probably not really fit in on a Sydney Madi Gras Float.


What happens though, is we go about trying to make everyone equal. Help enforce equality, even where it is inaccurate to do so. This is politically visible in programs such as Affirmative Action.

Some things that may make us different include – Religion, Race, Political Belief, Class, Ability, Physicality, Education, Sexuality, Taste, Style, Ethics, Moral Compass or Personal History.

Often these elements will be vastly and complexly intertwined – such as a Catholic Ethical system, or the Marxist view of religion.

If we focus of the ways in which we are different and unequal we are never going to get far. We are always going to find ourselves divided and torn apart.

However, in the spirit of Luthor King, we may find ourselves able to focus on that which makes us the same. Not only in the sense that we may match up those things above – connecting with others of our race/class/religion etc, but also by the very fact that we are all humans – to quote the cliché, ‘we all bleed red’. We each are participants in the human experience, familiar with the joys and depressions of what we are. We are each of us on a journey through this life, all travelers together.


Let’s have a look at one particular group who function through division. The Westboro Baptist Church, a group so weird you’ll have to try and work out who slipped the acid in your drink before realizing you’re viewing reality. See here –


http://view.break.com/278059 - Watch more free videos

The Westboro Baptist church focus very clearly on divisions of sexuality (God Hates Fags etc). The interest is in systematically maintaining hatred.

Imagine if instead of simply expressing a hatred of those who are not the same (a hatred not only directed at Homosexuals but at anyone not a member of the Church) this group focuses on inviting people to see how they lived, treating others as equals on a certain level (the level that they are human). Would they attract more change in people’s lives than they do through hate? I believe they would. We imitate those we like. The only people who could like this mob are anthropologists. But then, we do have to remember – they are only human.

As are we all.
44
Vote
   


I hate my Dad

January 28th 2008 13:44
There’s a protest on. Cars are stopped at the lights, waiting for the protesters to walk by. The first comes by with a Placard and yells “Down with Howard, War Mongering bastard”. The second comes along with a massive placard – “Destroy the neo-fascist evil Capitalist system!” Then a third comes along with a placard and yells;
“I hate my Dad!”


It’s a joke, but the message does convey a certain seriousness. The idea that those in our society – protesters, dissidents and radicals are simply acting out of our own anger against authority and fighting outside wars to avoid dealing with our own issues, is, sadly, not redundant.

The difficult thing to understand about righteous battles and causes it that there is no visible difference between the man executing his actions for a noble cause, and a man doing the same for a vengeance. The eye sees the same man, whether he is in Iraq to liberate the citizens in the name of liberty, or just wants to ‘scare up dem sand niggaz’.

Anti Bush Sticker Car
Hate Bush? Or just Anything?


This is a scary concept, especially when we regard the important role rebels and dissidents play in our society. It was dissidents who gained women’s rights, gay rights, Aboriginals rights. Dissidents have fought against injustice for many years.

This raises a question; is hatred – rational or otherwise – an essential component of a shift towards positive change? Women needed to hate their oppressors, as did Aboriginals and homosexuals. Without a powerful tide of resentment towards the Howard government, we would have never seen the birth of the Rudd Government.

Do we ever push for what is right? Or does society simply wait for the right moment to push against what is wrong? It has often been said of Australians that we do not vote Governments in, but out. We vote not for but against.

Does humanity really have those who fight for what is right? Or are we just a pack of lost kids waiting to seek revenge on the eternal omnipotent authority figure who consistently slips like mist through our fingers?

Image by TJ Scenes Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license.
63
Vote
   


Nihongo ga dekimasuka? I can! I speak Japanese and English. Kevin Rudd can speak Mandarin. Kerry Armstrong can speak Italian.

No matter who you are, learning a second language is more than worthwhile. But why?

Let’s take the obvious one first. Speaking another language helps you communicate with people from other countries. It may take a while to develop a level that lends itself to practical use, but it is rewarding when you can develop that level.

This communicative ability extends beyond direct conversation. It also helps us to understand what other cultures say about us, or any other issues.

How do you know when there is something wrong under the hood of your car? The Mechanic tells you, because he can understand what the inside of your car means. How do you really KNOW though that he’s honest, not just hitting you up for more that it’s worth? You don’t.

The second language equivalent of this broken car is a broken conversation. OR worse yet, a broken communication. If we rely on other people to convey the information we leave ourselves open to being mislead.

Gaijin Crime File
Gaijin Crime File


THIS IMAGE above is of a magazine sold in Japan, the title 外人犯罪ファイル is translated as Foreigner Crime file. One might think from looking at this, and it’s terminology (using terms such as ‘nigger’) that it reflects a general dislike of foreigners in Japan. However, if you can translate such things as Reviews on Amazon.com, you would be able to see what the Japanese really think of the publication. For this particular magazine there are two Japanese reviews, discussing concerns about the way in which Japanese may be thought of for the publication and expressing displeasure with the hypocrisy of the publication.

There are always controversies somewhere tied in with language, and the better your linguistic ability, the better you can understand all points of view to a debate. There was a great deal of fuss about the terminology used in a Japanese textbook to describe the Nanking Massacre (Have a look here for more on Japanese textbook controversies). Protests in China linked to the term ‘Incident’ being used instead of ‘Massacre’. We as a Western society consider these terms in their translated context – how we would feel if K-Rudd referred to Iraq ‘Incident’ instead of ‘War’. However, while the choice of terminology is definitely in this case political, a speaker of Japanese knows that incident (事変 carries dark connotations that would permit it as appropriate terminology.

Second example. Sheik Al-Hiali, who famously made the statement ‘If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem,” when referring to a victim of rape.

I remember early on following these comments, a story on the news, stating that they had their own ‘special translation’. In a world where one word could be translated as incident or massacre, imagine what a ‘special translation’ could possibly do. Not only could a second language specifically help you to understand the meaning of an original statement, the basic knowledge of a second language gives one a rudimentary grasp of the very nature of the flawed and malleable science of translation.

In conclusion it would be difficult to underestimate the value of learning a second language and I recommend it – for both the value of a second language and the value of the greater understanding and appreciation of the very nature of language.

Image W00kie licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
62
Vote
   


Kids Want To Learn

January 21st 2008 13:23
When you play your Nintendo DS and you’re working on an awesome game, and you get past level one, the game rewards you with a second level that is harder than the first. Your reward for completing a challenge is a harder challenge.

Think about small children. You see them poking, prodding, moving things around, experimenting. This is playing. It is also learning. To a point, the two things are, and should be, essentially linked.

A lot of children are initially exited to begin school. By the time you get up a few years though, this has changed. Kids are no longer enjoying learning in a school context, and even basic things like libraries and educational websites are beginning to be regarded as bad things.

Mark Twain is often quoted as saying ‘Never let your Education interfere with your learning.’ It’s great that we can keep this sentiment in mind, but it’d be even nicer to put it into practice. Essentially because this is the great paradox of learning.

We send students to school to learn. They want to learn. However, the institutionalisation of learning – schooling – is not always wanted. Often it is resented.



Why is this? To understand this we first have to accept that learning and schooling are ultimately separate concepts.

LEARNING – Extending personal ability.
- Gaining information and ability.
- Adoption of knowledge in theoretical and practical contexts.
- Developing an understanding of everyday things and concepts.

SCHOOLING – Systematic processes of social control
- Development of skill directed towards enabling students to gain employment through set processes.
- Process of social control.
- Disciplinarian structure with an emphasis on interpersonal competition.

Mindmap
Is this kind of thing acceptable in learning? In schooing? Organisation? Chaos? How should it all be done?

The first and arguably most important thing we can take from this is that learning and schooling are two separate concepts. To further extend this idea, we may also suggest that a student good at school is not by that token definitely a good learner, or that a student who is a good learner will definitely be a good student.

When we think back to the baby in the dirt, playing, LEARNING, it becomes a worry that through 12 years of schooling we manage to destroy so many students love of learning.

I do not think our school or education system is essentially broken or any such. What I do believe is that there are different ways to do things – and our duty as parents, teachers, facilitators of lifelong learning and life long learners ourselves, is to pursue these different methods of teaching and caring to ensure we never, ever, let the joy of learning whither up and die.

Image by Jurvetson, Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
68
Vote
   


Scissors, Paper, Rock, PAIN!!!

January 17th 2008 13:32
Scissors Paper Rock
PON!


This is a story from Japan. Now, I really don’t know how widespread this practice is, but I’m guessing it’s probably pretty wide, looking at some other precedents that I’ll get into later.

What I can tell you for absolute certain, is this game was common practice in the boys dormitory at Meitoku Gijuku, a boarding school where I spent some time, in Kochi, Shikoku Island.

Scissors, Paper, Rock is a national treasure of the Japanese nation. There it is called ‘jan ken pon’. If you win you can call out Katta! (I Win). If you tie you call out “Ai Kodde Shou” and redraw.

The boys dormitory loved this game. They played with a variation however. You’d have about five or six players at a time. They would all play and redraw until half got one option, and half the other. I.e. 2 rocks, 3 scissors. The winners were safe at this point, and all the losers would rematch until there was only one loser left. The loser would then pull up their shirt sleeve up, tense their muscles and wait. Then, one by one their competitors would, sometimes following a room long run up, punch them in the arm as hard as they possibly could. This was not by any stretch of the imagination, soft. The solid thump of fist on flesh would almost echo. There was no real winner, but it was generally accepted that the loser was the first one who couldn’t stand up after being punched.

Some Japanese blokes walked around with their sleeves barely concealing green bruises.

The Japanese have a reputation for these kinds of games. I recounted this game to one Japanese Uni student and he just shrugged. ‘There is a game’ he told me, ‘with a helmet and hammer on the table. When one person take the hammer, you have to take helmet and put on, before he hits you on the head.’

It seems hard to imagine that in a country where the culture is as homogenized as Japan, that such madness can flourish. However, anyone who has been there will tell you that this kind of violent game is not ‘in spite of’ but rather ‘because of’ this kind of culture – tiny explosions jumping out to address the stress of maintaining respectability with a spot of well earned RAH.

IMAGE by Meme! Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
53
Vote
   


What is Worth Living for?

January 14th 2008 12:54
I wrote an article a while back entitles ‘What is worth dying for’? It seems only logical that there should be a similar assessment of the equal, opposite question- what is worth living for?

I don’t want to make a feel good list of glurge here. I want to make a list of real, reasons to be alive – things that, if you met someone hovering halfway between life and death, would provide real, genuine motivation to choose the former


[ Click here to read more ]
46
Vote
   


Is Wikipedia Biased?

January 10th 2008 10:32
Evil Wiki
Some People See Wikipedia Like This - But is it Really True?

Shinzo Abe and Geoffrey Blainy have one thing in common. History. And the desire to express it in a way that is more beneficial to their own personal ideal world views.

[ Click here to read more ]
95
Vote
   


When I performed in a play called ‘Looking 4 Redemption’ we spoke at length about Matriarchal and Patriarchal systems. Patriarchal systems were more masculine, and focussed on control and domination. Matriarchal systems were more feminine, and based on nurture and caring. It was determined pretty early on that if all countries were based on a Martiarchal system, we’d be a good deal more peaceful.

With this in mind would the world be better off with female world leaders? If so, should we legislate to ensure this manifests


[ Click here to read more ]
67
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
179 Posts dating from December 2001
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Brenton's Blogs

12161 Vote(s)
377 Comment(s)
139 Post(s)
3952 Vote(s)
17 Comment(s)
66 Post(s)
4365 Vote(s)
45 Comment(s)
57 Post(s)
Moderated by Brenton
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]