Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Tales From The Other Side - Alternative Culture to enlighten a mediocre mood

 
Alternative Culture and ideas, ready to be injected into your Reality.

Banksy

October 29th 2007 06:01
When God sneaks out at night to stencil an old brick wall, he’s making a picture of Banksy. That’s how awesome Banksy is.

Banksy is a well known artist and trickster, centred in England. He is most famous for his stencils, produced illegally in public spaces around England.

Banksy In Bristons Park Street
A Banksy Painting which locals voted to keep, rather than remove



Banksy Skeleton Boat
Banksy art on a Social Entertainment Boat


Banksy Pulp Fiction
A Banksy image, now famously erased by London Police



His works typically consist of Rats, Celebrities, Public Figures or Authority Archetypes and Children amongst other reoccurring themes.

Banksy Rats
An example of Banksy's Rats


Banksy Charles Manson Hitchhiker
Banksy's Works often feature Public Figures


Banksy Child
A Banksy Child Work


He has also focussed on cultural and multimedia such as the famed ‘McDonald Balloon Girl’ and works of art painted directly onto live animals.

Banksy Work on Cows
Banksy Art on Cows


Banksy's Stonehenge
Stonehenge made with Public Toilets at the Glastonbury Music Festival



Banksy had also painted the Dividing wall between Israel and Palestine.

banksy rockboy
Banksy Painting on the Palestinian Side of the West Bank Dividing Wall


Banksywall2


Banksy Palestine Balloon Girl


A more recent prank that gained considerable attention was the Paris Hilton CD. While Paris was being released, Banksy was busy collaborating with Dangermouse to produce Paris Hilton Remixes such as "Why am I Famous?", "What Have I Done?" and "What Am I For?"

Banksy Paris
Banksy's Version of the Paris Hilton Single


He has also snuck ‘ancient cave drawings’ of Cavemen pushing trolleys, into Museums, along with other works.

Banksy Caveman


Banksy in Bristons Park Street , and on Boat Photographed by Adrian Pingstone in November 2006 and placed in the public domain.

Charcles Manson Taken by JustinC. This file is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 License (cc-by-sa-2.0). In short: you are free to share and make derivative works of the file under the conditions that you appropriately attribute it, and that you distribute it under this or a similar cc-by-sa license.

Pulp Fiction Image from LinguistAtLarge, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license versions 2.5, 2.0, and 1.0


Banksy Rats by Wetwebwork, licensed under a share alike attribution license.


Banksy Child taken by Matt Whitby in Brick Lane, East End. 2004

Cows from HERE. All rights Reserved, but used under fair use rationale.

Boy on Rock Originally from Really Long Link (Dead link)
Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rockboy.jpg
Used under Fair Use.

IMAGE2 and

IMAGE 3 Original Copy write unknown.
Used under Fair Use Rationale.

"Stonehenge" made of portable toilets, made by Banksy at the Glastonbury Festival June 2007. Taken by Rod Ward 22nd June 2007.Image is in Public Domain.

Rock, All Rights Reserved used on HERE. Used here under Fair Use.
65
Vote
   


Kiddie Energy Drinks

October 25th 2007 03:24
Remember Bad Boy, that brand with that feisty Eight year old with big muscles on T-shirts – think a white version of little boy 50 Cent. Well they’ve branched out from clothing. Now they make energy drinks.

badboy energy drink


Have a look at the can design. The image of the ‘Badass Face’, the simple lines and colour design, the anti authoritarianism, the name of the product. This is not an energy drink aimed at the adult energy drink market.

Even more profoundly disturbing is the ‘Monster Mash’ product. Turn the can on it’s side and you’ll see a list of reasons to drink Monster Mash. Number 2?


You’re too young to by alcohol. See the picky?

monster energy drink
What age group do you suspect this appeals to?


Basically the message is this – this is what you can drink to get messed up – not drunk, but you can still achieve a caffeine high; it’s cool.


Marketing is a strange beast. It’s what makes us pay $5.00 for something that has an exact equivalent at $3.00. It’s why blokes can drink mild without looking like a sissy, and why chicks will buy certain types of ice-cream that don’t make them look like a Bogan. And it’s how, right now, people in suits and ties are seducing your children into indulging in addictive drugs, right under your nose.
59
Vote
   


The Case For Marijuana

October 22nd 2007 09:17
The other side to THIS POST.

Marijuana use is so prevalent in Australia that it’s not uncommon for it to enter casual conversation without the same kind of awkward tension that other taboo subjects might create.

The main argument for marijuana is that the argument against it is entirely weak and desperate. Marijuana is illegal as it is apparently a gateway drug, and dangerous. While there are certain dangers associated with Marijuana (that are far lesser than many legal drugs) it is the gateway drug that is most often cited.

However, if pot is indeed a gateway drug, it would seem likely to me that the only reason this is so is that it is an individuals’ first venture into the world of illegal drugs. Therefore marijuana becomes a gateway drug BECAUSE it is illegal – and not vice versa.

The other way for marijuana to function as a gateway drug is through being able to supply an individual with a high they want to replicate, then extremify. If this were true, then why do we permit other drug use – Alcohol, a depressant, as is Heroin, Caffeine in popular energy drinks, an upper, as is Ecstasy, and Nicotine, a mild upper with addictive properties, such as those possessed by methamphetamine.

In fact, the fetish of Anti-Marijuana ranting, can be seen to be doing more harm then good – making pot more cool rather than less.

Some people are responsible. Some are less so. However, we cannot just work off the assumption that because a thing may be abused by an individual, to that individuals detriment, that we may legitimately protect those irresponsible individuals with paternalistic blanket laws.

The laws that govern marijuana illegalisation are not evil, and are not a form of ideological warfare, for the most part. They are, in a very literal way, noble laws. But as the adage says, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Marijuana laws go a small way to protecting youth against drugs, but at a great cost. An increasingly more powerful black-market industry, widely wasted and abused emergency forces and a perception that Government information on drugs is untrue and other illegal drugs are likely to be as safe as marijuana ensure that much of the good done by marijuanas illegalisation is swamped out by the bad.
113
Vote
   


Listen to Noah?

October 19th 2007 09:44
“Um, guys?” says Noah.

“What?”

“We have a problem. Rain is going to come down. Huge flood. Wipe everything out. We have to build an Ark.”

“Bullshit.”

“Nah, fair dinkum.”

“Who says?”

“God says.”

“Bullshit.”

“Look, he passed on the message. That’s it. We have to work together, build an Ark. Get two of every creature on it. And we have to start changing our lifestyle to be less sinful.”

“To hell with you, you puritan bastard. I know this is rubbish. You must have some kind of loopy secret agenda to be spreading these foul lies.”

Noah and the angry disagreement man part ways. However it is not long until they meet again.

“Hey Noah”

“Gahh, what?”

“I can prove you’re wrong.”

“Dude. You can’t. There’s a flood coming. God’s sending it to destroy all the sin.”

“I can disprove it.”

“…riiiight.”

“These individuals who I quote these following statistics off, state that though rigorous theological testing, these is unlikely to be a flood…”

“The test has been done, mate.”

“Oh no, not this one. My carefully chosen set of expert scientists have through considerable research examined the problem. They discovered that this Global Flooding is simply factually untrue. They further decided that even if it is true, then it’s not the result of an act of God based on increasing sin levels but a simple natural phenomenon that is unaffected by human actions.”

“I don’t suppose this study was funded by casinos and brothels?”

“The study was funded in part by some groups like those you mentioned, but that in no way damages the integrity of the study, and to suggest it does is offensive to the professionals who put their efforts into the study.”

Then the rain starts.


**********


“Um Guys,” says Dr Scientist.

“What?”

“We have a problem. Ice Caps are melting. Human influence is accelerating Global Warming. We have to curb our consumption.”

“Bullshit.”

“Look, that’s the scientific consensus. That’s it. We have to start looking at viable scientific ways in which to solve these problems. And we have to start pursuing alternatives to our excessive Greenhouse Gas Emissions.”

“To hell with you, you alarmist greenie bastard. I know this is rubbish. You must have some kind of loopy secret agenda to be spreading these foul lies.”

Dr Scientist and the Self Righteous Conservative part ways. However, it is not long until they meet up again.

“Hey Dr Scientist”

“Gahh what?”

“I Can Prove you’re wrong”

“Dude. You can’t. Global warming is a scientifically proven consensus.”

“I can disprove it.”

“Riiiiiiight”

“New research from a specially selected panel of independent unbiased experts suggest there is no correlation between levels of C02 and the rate of the Earths warming.”

“Dude, the tests have been done.”

“Ohhh yes, but this is from a new group of professionals who know more than the world’s highest regarded scientists. There is no truth to this ‘global warming’ and even if there is, it is certainly not man made.”

“I don’t suppose this was funded by right wing agendas and oil industries?”

“Well there may be some association with those interests but that in no way impedes the credibility of the research and to suggest so is an affront to those working hard on this research.”

Then, the weather changes.
69
Vote
   


Your Popsicle’s Melting

October 18th 2007 12:45
Café Press is a nifty little webpage. Using its tools you can set up pages to sell merchandise with your own designs on it.

I has one shirt with an image of a Popsicle on the front pocket. On the back pocket it had the phrase ‘your Popsicle's melting’.

Your Popsicle's melting
The offending image


Popsicle
When I went to my page to retrieve the written image, I found this image too was flagged as inappropriate. Perhaps my artistic talent was good enough for this to be considered a strong likeness of the Popsicle brand specifically?


Now, I didn’t really think too much of this design. It was cute, but nothing special. And certainly, I thought, not controversial.

How wrong was I? A few months into my Café Press experience I received a letter saying that one of my designs had been canceled.

I was wondering which design could have been construed as offensive. I entertained a few of possibilities. However, this one in particular was never considered. So, why was it offensive enough to be taken off Café Press?

Popsicle is a trademark owned by Unilever. Therefore I was potentially making money off their product trademark.

The history of the Popsicle is a proud one. It was basically made by some dude for his kids. He only ever put a patent on it after a few years at their insistence. He later sold the trademark.

And now? Now that same word, Popsicle, is being used to crush down a fifteen year old’s design, lest he make money of a word that has fallen into common usage.

Thank god for capitalism hey?

The great irony - I was in the wrong - I was copying someone else - Beck - the Popsicle line was in a song of his. So it's OK for Beck, apparently.

If Beck wanted off I'd be cool.

Actually if Beck wanted me to give him all my possessions I probably would. He's so great.

PS - My remaining items can be found HERE.
83
Vote
   


Run away! Run away! The politically correct people are everywhere! It seems everyone is scared of political correctness.

What is Political Correctness? Wikipedia defines it as “a term used to describe language or behavior which is intended, or said to be intended, to provide a minimum of offence, particularly to racial, cultural, or other identity groups. A text that conforms to the ideals of political correctness is said to be politically correct


[ Click here to read more ]
44
Vote
   


I.C.E

October 11th 2007 13:30
Just a quick reminder; an I.C.E number is an In Case of Emergency number. This is the number that somebody should call if you are injured and taken to hospital, or other similar circumstance. It’s a good idea to pick someone (Parent carer etc) and list their number under I.C.E on your phone. That’s all.
59
Vote
   


The Case Against Marijuana

October 8th 2007 13:08

However, There is a strong case against Marijuana, and it’s important to explore it.

[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


Dangers of Ecstacy Use

October 7th 2007 14:10
MATURE CONTENT
   


Is Racism Justified?

October 4th 2007 13:30
We treat different people in different ways. We have to. People are different. We don’t try to demand folk with wheelchairs climb the stairs, and we don’t ask Vietnamese actors to play Michael Jackson in the biopic of his life.

However, when we decide on how to treat people based on race, we run into the issue of racism. The best way to describe racism, I find, is to regard it as ‘racial discrimination’ – specific discrimination based on an individuals race or ethnicity. And there is a question of if racial discrimination is ever appropriate to which I would have to say “yes”. Now it’s very easy to get all indignant and be all like ‘that’s not cool man! We’re all the same on the inside! Don’t be hating


[ Click here to read more ]
80
Vote
   


What's Happening In Burma

October 1st 2007 08:17
Quick note - anyone who wants to know what's happening in Burma right now in the most clear and concise way possible, you could do much worse than reading THIS POST by Damo.
51
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
179 Posts dating from December 2001
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Brenton's Blogs

12753 Vote(s)
391 Comment(s)
139 Post(s)
4064 Vote(s)
17 Comment(s)
66 Post(s)
4810 Vote(s)
47 Comment(s)
58 Post(s)
Moderated by Brenton
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]